Wednesday, May 30, 2012

Exam Review (Forever Odd)


Forever Odd by Dean Koontz



There's a guy holding a jar of peanut butter at the grocery store. There are a half a dozen registers open, with unfriendly customers waiting in line behind each one. Among the hectic environment, a barely audible, “I can help whose next,” is faintly spoken, accompanying a dimly lit, yellow colored “14” above the lane. The peanut butter guy shifts his feet nonchalantly and calmly starts for register fourteen. A middle aged woman, just coming from the vegetable section sees the open lane as well. They both arrive precisely at the same time. The peanut butter guy, without any hesitation, extends his hand to the side and smiles. The unexpected kindness catches the woman off guard. As she moves forward to checkout, her eyes relay a genuine “thank you” with a nod of her head.
Odd Thomas is like the peanut butter guy. He’s that slightly insignificant, overlooked detail that makes the world a better place.

Forever Odd is a strong story, with multi-dimensional characters, and an occasional philosophical line of dialogue that readers will feel compelled to write down or underline. Multiple times after I read something, I would grab my pen and underline what I liked right then and there. "And the road the world makes for us is one that teaches humility if we are willing to learn" (279).

I have never read anything of Dean Koontz until Odd Thomas and Forever Odd. His usage of imagery is immense and empowering. I remember most the description of a tarantula crawling up the wall. Odd stood in the middle of the room, the spider crawling directly overhead. As he turns and leaves the room, the creature releases his grip from the ceiling and free falls to the ground. Odd leaves, only to here the thud of dense, fleshy mass hit the floor. Being a writer myself, I am intrigued by Koontz ability to write so much and to have so much power in his words. His use of similies through the story made an easier job of grasping and understanding the characters feelings and/or motives.
Odd Thomas, a quick order chef at the Pico Mundo Grille, wakes up to the spirit of Dr. Jessup lingering in his bedroom. After following his psychic magnetism, his natural-born-instinct that tells him where to go, he learns that along with Dr. Jessup's death, Danny Jessup is gone. Odd and Danny had always been friends, and Danny's medical problem with brittle bones worried Odd. Odd sets out to find his friend, learning about himself throughout the journey. He eventually must confront a dark, seductive character, Datura, and her two enormous henchmen. Past the firstfights, stealthy escapes, and a new load of laundry, Odd must overcome his obstacles and release Danny. Although genuine kindness is one of Odd's good features, it can become overpowering and cause him to put himself in danger. I mean, if one was born with a special gift like seeing the dead, I presume anyone would ponder why they have that ability. There must be reason. Odd struggles with the fact that he cannot save everyone. It's simply not possible, but he will work from his core to do as much as he can.

In the first book, Odd Thomas, Stormy was introduced. She was Odd's soul mate and they loved each other deeply. At the end of the book, we learn that Stormy was killed in a public shooting. Through the story in Forever Odd, Odd has to cope and learn to live without her. Near the end of the book, Odd is slashed across the chest and almost killed. He fades in and out of death and is eventually taken into care by his good friends. He says, "Chief, I was this close to Stormy, this close to service" (351). It's a very moving part of the story; Odd truly loves Stormy, so much so that being brought back to health was a bittersweet thing. I particularly like how the police Chief replies.
I underlined it.
"Everything in its own time, to its own schedule" (351).

Tuesday, May 15, 2012

Readicide

The books we are required to read must be in the curriculum there for a reason, right? I think I understand the school’s intention behind teaching books like To Kill a Mockingbird and Catcher in the Rye, but I never really respected the books themselves. As a sophomore, I didn’t understand the point in reading Shakespeare’s Romeo and Juliet. Or Macbeth.
But this year, something changed.
As a senior, I highly recommend to any underclassmen to take British Literature senior year. Everything changed in that class. Everything applied. Everything was relevant. I think one of the reasons students feel uninterested or disconnected from books is because they feel like it has nothing to do with them; it doesn’t relate. How can a piece written in the 1600’s apply to the modern world? Reasonable argument. It wasn’t until this year that I felt like class books like Hamlet and Brave New World were actually real, they held significance to me. We were in tune.
Then I think about the underclassmen’s English classes. Romeo and Juliet looks at phases that a majority of adolescents go through. Independence, love, tough family life, it is meant for us to relate too. But maybe it’s not working as much as it has in the past. Students find pleasure in reading modern books so maybe the system needs to change. Why don't teachers try going 50-50 with the classics and modern literature? There's bound to be teachable moments in some of those popular books, and if students are more engaged then that would prove to be a benefit in the classroom.

Sunday, May 6, 2012

Why I Read

I read because I like words. I like the power that words possess. I believe that writing and reading are necessary for understanding on multiple levels. They let us see from other eyes, walk in different shoes. No matter what kind of genre, books share ideas and thoughts that (I believe) can shape people. Inspiration comes from books. Connection and conversations come from books.
When one writes, they allow others to listen. I enjoy being a listener.
I think the majority of people who don't enjoy reading have a good reason why they don't like to read. Have you ever been forced to read a book for class? If you actually finished it, how much did you like that book? I remember freshman year I had to read The Color of Water. I loathed it. Not because it was a bad book, it was probably a very good book, (that's why the school makes students read it!) but because it was being forced upon me, I was immediately uninterested.
On the contrary, I read Brave New World this year in British Literature and had a completely different experience. The thought provoking topics were always floating around in my head, waiting to be discussed about in class. Its ideas shaped how I looked at situations in my everyday life.
Everyone takes something from books. Whether you agree or disagree, like or dislike, we all take something away from the experience. That is why I enjoy reading.